Re: Hangman
 

Let's go crazy and see if there is an X here. :insane2:

Re: Hangman
 

Precedent

_ A _ _ / _


Not in this case: N, X

__________
| . . . . . . . |
| . . . . . . . O
| . . . . . . ./
|
|
|_____

Re: Hangman
 

Short understandible word. Maybe precedent Bush... Or Kate Bush. I think this is more like a pesticide (much like the Bush family is for the human race, but hey, they are from the planet of apes so we don't hold it against them nor Kate Bush) .

We need a I for the religious sinner here.:icon_cool

Re: Hangman
 

Morph, You might be a religious sinner, but you are completely immaculate human being...:zlaugh:

Precedent

_ A _ _ / _


Not in this case: N, X, I

__________
| . . . . . . . |
| . . . . . . . O
| . . . . . . ./|
|
|
|_____

Re: Hangman
 

I decline to all humanity! Even immaculistm. (Those basdardly moles and Madonna!) Thus I choose Y for a yellow bird.:nodder:

Re: Hangman
 

Yay!

Precedent

_ A _ Y / _


Not in this case: N, X, I

__________
| . . . . . . . |
| . . . . . . . O
| . . . . . . ./|
|
|
|_____

Re: Hangman
 

We are close to Nixon.My favorite! He liked to use pesticare on pedesterians. Not this Obama-care enematreatment...:pirate:

Re: Hangman
 

Precedent

_ A _ Y / _


Not in this case: N, X, I, N

__________
| . . . . . . . |
| . . . . . . . O
| . . . . . . ./|\
|
|
|_____

Re: Hangman
 

Åk Åk--- L

Re: Hangman
 

Go Go L? No No L :smile:
And: I am not going to hang you...I am going to stretch you...Note: This was a very famous american legal case about 25 years ago that had to do with parental rights...

Precedent

_ A _ Y / _


Not in this case: N, X, I, N, L

__________
| . . . . . . . |
| . . . . . . . O
| . . . . . . ./|\
| . . . . . . . /
|
|_____