Re: Hangman
 

The O of OF, you mean ;)?


That’s not quite what it was written for

B A E D E K E R / B L I T Z / O F / _ _ _ _

not quite either: H,U,H?

1____
1|123|
1|12.:doubt:
1| 1./
1|123
1|123
1|______

Re: Hangman
 

:bonk:

:idea: 1942?

Re: Hangman
 

Full marks (and over) to pearla for finding out about this part of WWII history, a series of attacks on those places “marked with three stars in the Baedeker Guide” in retaliation of the RAF bombing raids. Militarily rather useless, but of course just as deadly to the civilians down below.

Re: Hangman
 

Bigger Eddy

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _



______
| . .
|
|
|
|
|____

Re: Hangman
 

eduardO

Re: Hangman
 

Bigger Eddy

_ _ _ _ _ _ _O O _



______
| . .
|
|
|
|
|____

Re: Hangman
 

Gigantic

Re: Hangman
 

Bigger Eddy

_ _ _ _ _ _ _O O _

:no: T

______
| . . |
| . . O
|
|
|
|____

Re: Hangman
 

WHIRLPOOL (+ that extra letter you inserted with the O’s ;))

Re: Hangman
 

@Helanren - Couldn't fool you! (although the extra letter was an error, not intentional!)

Helanren is next! :jossun: